PreviousNext

Imagining, and Measuring, the Unimaginable

At the Center for Architecture, On View by • 03/05

Humans have been studying earthquakes scientifically for about 2,000 years, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory geophysicist Dr. Klaus Jacob says, ever since Han Dynasty-era polymath Zhang Heng invented the first seismometer so that the Emperor would know about distant earthquakes before the news reached him by messengers on horseback. Now we have multiple networks, like the Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology, the U.S. Geological Survey, and overseas equivalents, linked and sharing information. Knowing a quake is likely doesn’t equate to predicting its timing, but the state of knowledge about locations, depths, and magnitudes helps the design and construction professions prepare for these probabilistic events and mitigate damage.

Jacob may be better known in recent years as the expert who presciently warned New Yorkers about the risks of flooding, proven accurate in 2012 by Superstorm Sandy. He’s also the first-call seismologist for anyone needing detailed analyses of the risks of a major quake in New York, an event that strikes with far less warning. Jacob spoke at the inaugural panel of the Design for Risk and Reconstruction (DfRR) Committee in October 2011; his return engagement on the first DfRR panel linked with the “Considering the Quake” exhibition reminded the audience that, although we have come to know a great deal about these events, “it’s good… not to talk about the last, but the next disaster.” Jacob and his colleagues know more about these contingencies than most people would want to, at least if they ever wanted to sleep again.

There were 141,478 seismic events detected worldwide between 1960 and 2008 by the Global Seismographic Network, Jacob reported, distributed in a clear nonrandom pattern that has provided information about the movement of tectonic plates and the energy released when they grind together. The edges of the Pacific plate have the highest concentration of events and the severest events, but the Northeast has had multiple quakes over recent decades as well, mostly smaller ones with magnitudes of 5.0 or below, along very old cracks in the crust (particularly the Ramapo Fault system across eastern Pennsylvania, northern New Jersey, and Upstate New York). New Yorkers felt the 2011 quake that was epicentered near Richmond, Virginia; East Coast geology makes quakes perceptible and hazardous hundreds of miles from their epicenter, not as localized as western quakes involving softer rock. “It’s a very low rate compared to what happens on a plate boundary, but it cannot be ignored,” he said.

Studies show “a probability within 50 years, sort of a minimum lifetime of a reasonable structure…. By the wisdom of the community in the United States, we’ve decided that 2% in a 50-year chance is sort of an acceptable level to describe the hazard,” Jacob explained. The relative rarity of East Coast quakes, he added, means the records (instrumental data plus anecdotal reports back to 1627) yield information that let us extrapolate a risk of one 6.5-magnitude quake in about 1,000 years, or one 4.9 about every 100 years, with considerable play in the figures. Severe quakes are rare here, not impossible, and the larger exposure area means the hazard is actually proportionately higher, despite the greater absolute rate in the West. This context, Jacob said, explains Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s concerns about hazards to the Indian Point nuclear power plant, built in an era when less local information was available, but now “declared the seismically most vulnerable reactor in the United States.” Earthquakes tend to trigger submarine slides and tsunamis, he added, amplifying concerns over surges like Sandy. Closing with an estimate of the exponentially increasing amounts of debris that would result from quakes of various magnitudes, Jacob exhorted architects to “make sure that this debris is minimized. That’s your task,” achievable only over decades or centuries as the city replaces its building stock.

Sissy Nikolaou, Ph.D., PE, M.ASCE, of Mueser Rutledge and the Geotechnical Extreme Event Reconnaissance (GEER) project, presented dramatic video and still images, including recent material from the Greek island of Cephalonia, where quakes destroy buildings about every 30 years, as well as more publicized events like the 1995 quake in Kobe, Japan. She outlined several prevalent misconceptions (e.g., that the harder rock of the New York area, compared to the younger crust of the West Coast, makes us quakeproof; what it does is transmit shock waves further) and clarified important distinctions, particularly between hazard and risk (the latter involves the economic value of assets destroyed and can be massive in places like New York, which produces 9% of the U.S. economy, even if physical seismic hazard is only moderate). Assessing vulnerability to “the three D’s” of downtime, damage, and death, calls for some counterintuitive recognition, she noted, particularly that “building stronger is not always better.” Protective strategies need to consider soil structure, liquefaction risk, and resonance, ensuring that buildings do not resonate at similar frequencies; a building atop deep, soft deposits is a worst-case scenario, and the Mets’ Citifield – built, she said, on “100 feet of mushy stuff, that when you shake it, behaves like Jello in a bowl” – is consequently designed to an extraordinarily strict seismic standard. Chinatown buildings, too, sited above the Collect Pond once used for potable water, require extra-deep foundations.

Ramon Gilsanz, PE, of Gilsanz Murray Steficek, described seismic events through a musical metaphor: if an earthquake resembles the score, the soil is the player transmitting the vibration, and a building is the instrument that plays it. Engineering approaches to minimizing these destructive performances can recognize a building’s distinctive resonance and plan for damping the “sound” in any of several ways. Chilean engineers, working in a highly vulnerable zone, strengthen buildings with interior shear walls; the Japanese approach is to try to keep the instrument from being played at all by isolating a building’s base from the soil with enormous (and expensive) shock absorbers, aiming to minimize damage enough for nearly immediate occupancy. In the U.S., a cost-effective approach prevails, allowing structures to deform and designing only for life safety, not prompt reoccupancy. Much of the worst damage, Gilsanz noted, occurs after a quake, not during it: in the 1906 San Francisco quake, only 3-5% of the buildings were directly damaged, but fire caused far worse destruction.

SUNY Buffalo civil-engineering chair Andrew Whittaker’s presentation (titled “Won’t Happen Here,” but making no such assertion; a question mark appears implicit) went into detail about the consequences when it does happen. Having lived through two quakes personally in California in 1989 and 1994, he is under no illusions that it is strictly a “left coast problem”. Earthquakes here are inevitable (though perhaps not in any given lifetime), resilience is essential, and the most pressing risk involves “non-engineered building structures,” built before codes were in place or not designed up to code. In New York, unreinforced masonry (URM) is the norm in Federal Era buildings, row houses built between the 1830s and about 1940, many schools, and even firehouses (the risk that firefighters’ own buildings could collapse and trap fire vehicles during a general disaster, he noted, calls for urgent attention). Quake-prone New Zealand, he noted, “substantially underestimated the hazard” before the 2011 Christchurch event, and many URM buildings were damaged to the red-tag level, requiring demolition. Engineered buildings’ protective attributes include lateral resistance, lateral load paths, continuity in floor plates, and redundancy; the Applied Technology Council’s ATC-58 standard, on which Whittaker participated, allows engineers and architects to design for specific levels of risk. An easily overlooked consideration, he added, is the risk from nonstructural components (e.g., ceilings, partitions, elevators, and internal goods), simply “stuff” that also breaks and moves, and that constitutes about 98% of losses in quakes. “Keep in mind,” he noted, “that costs associated with business interruption often far exceed the repair costs.” Imagining a 5.8-magnitude quake striking Manhattan, Whittaker described a staggering cascade of fires, homelessness, impacts on physical infrastructure and social systems, and loss of life.

The Q&A segment included an important and often-overlooked scenario, in a question by DfRR Co-chair Joan Capelin: the phenomenon of induced earthquakes, including those resulting from hydraulic fracturing for fossil fuels as well as quarrying. Both practices have been associated with seismic events, panelists noted, and the fluids pumped into the ground for fracking create additional toxic hazards underground. “When you mess around with Mother Earth,” Jacob summarized, “it often comes around to haunt you if you don’t understand the process.”

Event: Are We on Shaky Ground? Earthquakes and New York City
Location: Center for Architecture, 02.27.2014
Speakers: Dr. Klaus H. Jacob, Geophysicist, Columbia University Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory; Dr. Sissy Nikolaou, PE, Senior Associate and Director, Geo-Seismic Department, Mueser Rutledge Consulting Engineers; Ramon Gilsanz, PE, SEI Fellow, Founding Partner, Gilsanz Murray Steficek (GMS) and Chair, NYC DOB Structural Technical Committee responsible for the 2014 NYC Building Code revision; Dr. Andrew E. Whittaker, Director, SUNY Buffalo (UB) Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research and Chair, UB Department of Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering
Organizers: Center for Architecture, AIANY Design for Risk & Reconstruction Committee, and the New York–Northeast (NYNE) Chapter of the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI)

Comments are closed.

Member Dues: Good News! AIA News You Can Use
Grand Central Terminal
LPC Reform: Improving Important Processes Policy Pulse
Speakers of "Edge Collaborations: Creative Partnerships with Social Science" discussed how architects and social scientists can mutually gain from a closer relationship.
Measuring Bubbe’s Wisdom and Edifying Clients At the Center for Architecture
AIANY's Fourth Annual Golf Classic brought together more than 140 golfers from the architecture, engineering, construction, and real estate communities out for a beautiful day.
AIANY Fourth Annual Golf Classic Recap Reports from the Field
Speakers and organizers of "Marketing Resiliency Part II: Creating and Communicating a Critical Sector” brought together by the AIANY Marketing Communications Committee and the AIANY Design for Risk and Reconstruction Committee.
Resiliency Today: Systems, Standards, and the Case for Going Broad At the Center for Architecture
A toy store imagined and designed by middle school students in the Summer@theCenter’s Store Design summer program.
Design Thinking and Tinkering: Store Design at the Center for Architecture Learning by Design
1 - The Battery Catches the Brass Ring
In the News In The News
Names in the News Names in the News
09.20.15: Call for Entries: FIGMENT, AIANY ENYA, and SEaONY City of Dreams Pavilion 2016
New Deadlines New Deadlines
“Sea Level: Five Boroughs at Water’s Edge” at Center for Architecture at the Seaport Cultural District Opening 09.10.15
On View On View
08.19.15: George Tsypin, founder of the George Tsypin Opera Factory and luminescent sea creature designer, takes a ride on an angel fish at the press opening for WXY Architecture + Urban Design’s SeaGlass Carousel at Battery Park.
Sighted Sighted
Classifieds Classifieds
“Sea Level: Five Boroughs at Water’s Edge” opens Monday, 08.31.15 at the Seaport.
Center @ the Seaport Editor's Soapbox
Speakers at "Viral Voices IV: Storytelling: On Media, Representation, and Narrative," organized by the AIANY Global Dialogues Committee
This Expanded Language At the Center for Architecture
•	Urban Green Council and AIANY held State of the Art: Lighting Design & Controls on 08.03.15.
Meet, Greet and Solve Problems: Meetings with City Council Members Policy Pulse
Andy Bernheimer, AIA, NCARB, Bernheimer Architecture, and Alan Organschi, Gray Organschi Architecture
Oculus Book Review: Timber in the City edited by Andrew Bernheimer, AIA, NCARB Book Reviews
Middle School students designed and built their own stores after visiting examples in SoHo and the Meatpacking District and talking with designers at Anderson Architects.
Summer@theCenter 2015 Learning by Design
Ashok Bhavnani, AIA (1934- 2015)
In Memoriam: Ashok Bhavnani, AIA, Ashok Bhavnani Architects (1933-2015) In Memoriam
1 - The Navy Yard's New Lab
In the News In The News
Names in the News Names in the News
10.09.15: Call for Entries: 2015 AIANY COTE Awards
New Deadlines New Deadlines
On View: About Town About Town
07.31.20: A work-in-progress! A snapshot of our beautiful new floor designed by Andrew Berman Architect. Come see the complete renovation at the opening of our fall exhibition “Un/Fair Use” on 10.10.2015.
Sighted Sighted
Classifieds Classifieds
Closed for renovation.
Center for Architecture Construction Update Editor's Note
BRIK Update: New Members-Only Research Databases AIA News You Can Use
A delegation representing New York's AIA chapters met with the office of Senator Chuck Schumer, who was a guest at AIANY's Heritage Ball in October 2014.
Advocacy in Action: Building a Case for Energy Efficient Buildings Policy Pulse
Ivan Vuckovic is the winner of the 2015 Walter A. Hunt, Jr. Scholarship
Center for Architecture Announces 2015 Walter A. Hunt, Jr. Scholarship Learning by Design
Stuart K. Pertz, FAIA
In Memoriam: Stuart K. Pertz, FAIA (1936-2015) In Memoriam
1 - Harlem on Their Mind
In the News In The News
Names in the News Names in the News
New Deadlines New Deadlines
On View: About Town About Town
07.20.15: AIANY Marketing and Communications Committee and AIANY Design for Risk and Reconstruction Committee invited a diverse panel to examine how firms build and communicate resiliency practices. (l-r) James Way and Delphine Daniels, AIANY Marketing and Communications Committee; Olivia Stinson, City Relationships at 100 Resilient Cities, The Rockefeller Foundation; Lance Jay Brown, FAIA, AIANY Design for Risk and Reconstruction Committee; Roland Lewis, Metropolitan Waterfront Alliance; Janice Barnes, PhD, LEED AP, Perkins + Will; John Boulé, PE, Dewberry.
Sighted Sighted
Classifieds Classifieds
Center for Architecture Summer Schedule Editor's Note
Thomas de Monchaux, Architect and Critic; Philip Nobel, SHoP Architects; Julia van den Hout, CLOG; and Nikolai Fedak, New York YIMBY
Regaining a Capitulated Criticism At the Center for Architecture
AIANY and DCP organized a panel discussion in April on the Zoning for Quality and Affordability proposal, which has since been updated.
Zoning Proposal Progresses Policy Pulse
Damon Rich, Principal, Hector, and Director, Newark Planning Office discusses popular education and its application in architecture and planning.
Representing Context as Political Strategy in Architecture At the Center for Architecture
Anibal Gavira, Mayor, City of Medellín, Colombia
All Eyes on Medellin At the Center for Architecture
Tom Finkelpearl, Commissioner, NYC Department of Cultural Affairs
Accessible Culture At the Center for Architecture
Tomas Rossant, AIA, AIANY; Phil Kirschner, JLL; Sara Williams, MIT; Jeff Ferzoco, LinePointPath; Darrick Borowski, ARExA; and Melissa Marsh, PLASTARC
Data in the Built Environment: New Sources, New Strategies At the Center for Architecture
Alex Alaimo, Assoc. AIA, AIANY Emerging New York Architects; Patricia Garcia Chimeno, Assoc. AIA, Architect-US; Gustavo Rodriguez, CODIA, LEED AP, FXFOWLE; Gemma Cortijo, Spain-US Chamber of Commerce; Carol Shapiro, Beverly Willis Architecture Foundation;Claire Weisz, FAIA, WXY; Alberto Merlo, Consulate General of Spain in New York; Jorge Mastropietro, JMAPC
Architect Interchange At the Center for Architecture
7th graders at IS 102Q at the final presentation of their model of the Piazza San Marco in Venice, completed with Design Educator Jessica Castillo (far left) and PS 102Q art teacher Mary O’Donnell (far right). All students at the school study Italian as a foreign language. The project helped students learn about Venice through its architecture.
Learning By Design: NY Wraps Up a Successful Year Learning by Design
1 - Park Perk
In the News In The News
Names in the News Names in the News
New Deadlines New Deadlines
On View: About Town About Town
06.26.15: Anne Priol and Mica Smadja brought to life the letters between architect-designer Eileen Gray and architect-critic Mica Smadja in the performance E1027: Design for Living, directed by artist Elizabeth Lennard and organized by the Center for Architecture with support from the Graham Foundation, Trustees Brooks Adams and Lisa Liebmann of the Herman Liebmann Foundation, and the French Ministry of Culture and Communications.
Sighted Sighted
Classifieds Classifieds